Secure Coding Patterns
Security engineers are often asked to review code and identify risky patterns. Interviews test your ability to spot vulnerabilities, reason about their impact, and propose practical fixes
What to expect
Typical interview prompts include:
- “You’re reviewing code for an API endpoint that processes user input. What do you look for?”
- “Here’s a function handling authentication. Are there any vulnerabilities?”
- “Which patterns in this snippet could lead to injection or data leaks?”
The majority of questions on secure coding patterns are scenario-based.
Interviewers want to see that you can reason systematically, not just identify specific vulnerabilities by name.
How to answer
Use this three-step process to explain your reasoning clearly:
- Identify risky patterns (anti-patterns). “I look for unsafe input handling, missing validation, or direct database queries.”
- Explain the risk. “This could allow attackers to inject code or access unintended data.”
- Propose a fix. “Use parameterized queries and validate input before executing database calls.”
Secure code cheatsheet
The table below summarizes common insecure coding patterns, the risks they create, and recommended mitigations. This helps you reason quickly and provide actionable advice during interviews.
Prompt: “You’re reviewing code for an API endpoint that processes user input. What do you look for?”
Strong structured response:
- Check for input validation and output encoding to prevent injection or XSS.
- Review authorization logic to ensure users can only modify their own data.
- Ensure error handling avoids leaking details about system internals.
- Verify logging practices redact sensitive input and output fields.