Why do you want to work at Anthropic?

"Very focused on the culture screening and "Why Anthropic," they pushed on this quite a bit. They really want to see that you have pre-sales experience as well, think I had more post sales experience and that was not as ideal for them."

"About Why Anthropic. They seem to really care. The recruiter seemed like they were really busy to even talk to me. They got interested after we started speaking. One question on how I handled low performers. I wish I had prepared for recruiter screen. I thought it would be generic, but it was what decided the HM next round."

"I did a hard pre-assessment first, then the recruiter fast-tracked me because I already had other offers and got me through the rest of the loop in about a week. The onsite was five rounds for me: hiring manager, coding, company values, system design, and then another coding round. The most unusual part was the company values interview, which was run by nontechnical people and felt almost like a therapy session because they kept probing how I felt, not just what I did. The technical rounds were more practical than I expected, while the behavioral side was where I felt the real pressure. I finished the loop, but at the time of this conversation, I was still waiting on the outcome."

"I did a hard pre-assessment first, then the recruiter fast-tracked me because I already had other offers and got me through the rest of the loop in about a week. The onsite was five rounds for me: hiring manager, coding, company values, system design, and then another coding round. The most unusual part was the company values interview, which was run by nontechnical people and felt almost like a therapy session because they kept probing how I felt, not just what I did. The technical rounds were more practical than I expected, while the behavioral side was where I felt the real pressure. I finished the loop, but at the time of this conversation, I was still waiting on the outcome."

"Tl;dr is that the process was hard, thoughtful, and more advanced than a typical ML loop imo. I got in through someone in my network, then after I applied I went through a recruiter screen, a technical use-case screen, an MLOps round, a hiring manager round, and a three-part final panel with ML design, behavioral, and culture fit. The whole process felt very centered on real LLM work: MCP and tooling, long context windows, memory, reliability, enterprise deployment, and whether I actually know when AI makes sense versus plain ML. One thing that stood out is they let me use their LLM in the interview system, which honestly made it feel closer to the real job than most AI interviews I have done. The culture fit round was the most distinctive because it went deep on ethics, executive pressure, and EQ, and it honestly felt almost like a therapy convo."

"I applied, and did a normal recruiter screen followed by a coding phone screen. After I passed that, hiring paused for the team, and then time passed until a different recruiter picked me back up for a virtual onsite. My onsite was a coding round, a system design round, a hiring manager round, a culture round, and a one-person technical presentation. At the time the question bank was small enough that I basically knew the kinds of questions coming, but Anthropic was one of my first loops, so I wasn't as sharpened as I should have been. I got pretty close but didn't get the offer, and my read is that the system design round hurt me the most."

"Overall the interview process was quite quick but also didn't feel very robust as I was expecting for this type of company! I think I failed one of the later technical rounds in the onsite."