Real Interview Experiences
Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.
Interviewed recently? Share your experience to try it free, or become a member for full access.
“Overall, the interview process was well-structured and gave me a good opportunity to demonstrate my problem-solving and programming skills. The interviewers were friendly, professional, and encouraged me to think through problems rather than simply focus on getting the final answer. What went well was the clarity of the problems and the collaborative nature of the discussions. I particularly appreciated being able to explain my approach, discuss trade-offs, and receive feedback or hints when appropriate. The process felt focused on understanding how I reasoned about problems rather than just evaluating whether I could produce a solution quickly. One area that could be improved is providing slightly more clarity around expectations for each stage of the process, particularly regarding the scope and format of the technical interviews. Overall, though, I had a positive experience and appreciated the time and effort the interviewers put into making the process fair and engaging.”
“The interviewer gave me a very abstract description of a system, I needed to design, intentionally to let me clarify it through the questions. Most likely because role success depends on how critical it is for you to bother other people with bombarding questions. After all the questions, I clearly understood the system I needed to design, but time was almost up, so I did not have a chance to finish it as I wanted, but maybe someone else will.”
“The process was smooth, everything went well. Both the interviewer and recruiter was really nice and polite. ”
“It was for an internal mobility role, they were checking of inhouse llm suite adoption and usage skills”
“This was first technical round of interview, I went through typical System design videos but it needs in depth knowledge of system design rather knowing on high level. I kind of assumed it is going to be tough based on Linkedin profile of interviewer. He caught me off guard on few concepts. Interview can go in any direction so prepare deep on concepts. He asked me to write Pseudo code as well. AI Round was good where I was able to answer all questions.”
“The recruiter was quite discouraging, as he mentioned that I should apply for entry-level roles after 7 years of experience. I understand it is in a different country but my experience is with US MNC only. Moreover, he explicitly stated that we hire only MBAs from top B-schools only. I could have performed better if I knew what would be asked, there was hardly any information available on the internet. Moreover, I learnt that PMs don't really choose to interact with customers/clients and are asked to work on features that they get from the sales team. Something to keep in mind if you are looking for a role that requires ownership. ”
“The overall process was fine but the concurrency interview required previous knowledge about those topics which is something that can hurt you if you don't know python. ”
“The interviews are scheduled over 2-3 days so the process is quick. They have a phone screen, DS round, DS with AI, System design and Hiring Manager round.”
“The interviewer seemed nice and helpful. The first half will be about a system that I have owned and the second half is about System Design.”
Preview full access of other recent interview experiences
“The weirdest Anthropic round was the company values interview. It was almost like a therapy session, and honestly if you went to a therapist at some point, you will pass that round much more easily.”
“What was very unusual is they didn’t give me any tooling to draw the system design, so I just sketched it on a piece of paper and talked them through it, then we got into this oddly deep debate about whether hover-over history should count as a recommendation signal.”
