Real Interview Experiences
Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.
Interviewed recently? Share your experience to try it free, or become a member for full access.
“The process was pretty standard, focused on Amazon leadership principles. Look up Exponent videos on how to answer behavioral questions.”
“The recruiter felt like there were casting a wide net when reaching out to me and only loosely checked if my background was aligned. When getting on the phone, they seemed like they were checking the box for basic requirements and I could see that it was not a good team fit when I actually met the hiring manager.”
“I thought I did pretty well for all interviews, but I think they were looking for someone with more experience in insurance and audit. ”
“Pretty standard product sense and product analytics interviews, similar to Meta-style PM interviews.”
“Overall it was a well structured interview. Final round required deep go and distributed systems understanding. ”
“The process was smooth and moved very quickly - definitely the most nerve-wracking interview since it included a 10 minute presentation to share with engineers, five 1:1 interviews, and traveling onsite. They seemed to care a lot about technical aptitude over anything else, so make sure your coding skills are solid. ”
“What went well: interesting questions, everybody kind and smart. What didn't go well: I should have prepared more to tell about business impact.”
“The process involved two coding rounds and a system design interview. The coding rounds went smoothly - I was comfortable with the data structures involved, including a question on binary indexed trees (Fenwick trees) for range sum queries. What didn't go well was the system design round; the interviewer gave very little feedback or direction, making it hard to gauge if I was on the right track. Communication from the recruiter between rounds was also slow.”
“The overall interview process with SoFi was structured, professional, and gave me a good opportunity to learn more about the team, the role, and the company’s expectations. The process included a mix of technical and behavioral conversations, which helped evaluate both engineering depth and culture fit. What went well was that the interviewers were thoughtful, respectful, and engaged throughout the conversations. I appreciated that the discussions were practical and focused on real engineering problems, tradeoffs, collaboration, and impact. The culture-focused conversations also gave me a better sense of how SoFi operates and what they value in senior engineers. What could have gone better was the scheduling and pacing of the interview process. Some of the rounds were grouped closely together, which made it harder to prepare deeply for each area, especially for system design and project deep dive discussions. I also would have appreciated a bit more clarity upfront on what each round would focus on and how to best prepare. Overall, it was a positive and rigorous interview experience. The process gave me a strong impression of SoFi’s engineering culture, and I appreciated the opportunity to meet with the team and discuss both technical leadership and execution in depth.”
Preview full access of other recent interview experiences
“The weirdest Anthropic round was the company values interview. It was almost like a therapy session, and honestly if you went to a therapist at some point, you will pass that round much more easily.”
“What was very unusual is they didn’t give me any tooling to draw the system design, so I just sketched it on a piece of paper and talked them through it, then we got into this oddly deep debate about whether hover-over history should count as a recommendation signal.”
