Real Interview Experiences
Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.
Interviewed recently? Share your experience to try it free, or become a member for full access.
“Overall experience was ok. The length of the interview was very long, and the recruiter sometimes would wait a couple of days before replying back ”
“Recruiter was very helpful, shared guides and interview tips. Study on the 3 sided marketplace, consumers, merchants, dashers. Interviewers were friendly”
“The process was well-structured, starting with a recruiter screen followed by a deep dive with the hiring manager and a final "super day" involving cross-functional stakeholders (Engineering, Sales, and Supply Chain). What went well was the alignment on product vision; I was able to demonstrate how my technical background helps bridge the gap between complex chemical solutions and digital customer tools. What didn’t go well was the initial technical case study—it was more data-heavy than I anticipated, requiring a very quick pivot to explain how I’d prioritize features under tight regulatory constraints.”
“The process was overall good, recruiter provided lots of advice and pointers for what to study. The biggest challenege is the pressure and time crunch on making sure you can answer everything but maintaining accuracy.”
“The interview process was fairly structured, starting with an initial screening followed by technical and/or managerial rounds. What went well was the clarity of questions and the opportunity to explain my thought process. One area that could have been better was the time allocated for certain discussions, which felt slightly rushed.”
“It was pretty straight forward and nice process. There was no onsite loop, the entire process was onsite.”
“Recruiter was good at communicating throughout and the interviewers seemed really engaged in the process. Excitable about their space. There is a product design portion where, given a prompt and UX snippet, users are asked to design a solution to the prompt. You are given about 30 min and then are grilled on that. There’s a basic analysis portion ensuring you can read basic data and infer decisions. ”
“The process was more rigorous than anything I’d done at other big tech companies, but the recruiter was accurate and helpful in guiding preparation, which I really appreciated. A few things caught me off guard: one round had unexpected case-style questions that weren’t mentioned beforehand. Overall, the structure was fair, and the interviewers were professional, though the pacing felt a bit rushed at times.”
“I enjoyed the whole process and transparency throughout. Though it's a bit dated, I'm sure the general premise is still the same. Recruiter phone screen Online coding assessment 45 mins tech interview Onsite with 3 technical interviews and 2 behavioural (1 of my tech was cancelled) Communication was always clear and it took a bit longer since it was over the Christmas break. Got offer shortly after the final and accepted, super glad! ”
Preview full access of other recent interview experiences
“The weirdest Anthropic round was the company values interview. It was almost like a therapy session, and honestly if you went to a therapist at some point, you will pass that round much more easily.”
“What was very unusual is they didn’t give me any tooling to draw the system design, so I just sketched it on a piece of paper and talked them through it, then we got into this oddly deep debate about whether hover-over history should count as a recommendation signal.”
