Real Interview Experiences
Learn what to expect directly from candidates and interviewers who've been through it.
Interviewed recently? Share your interview experience to unlock full access, or become a member.
“The process is a bit different than other companies. They are thorough and stress a lot of importance on the cases you will have to complete. The recruiter is very supportive throughout the process. ”
“The XFN behavioral interviews were pretty standard. The things that caught me off guard was 1) the app critique, because they just let me keep talking and using the app and I wasn't really sure what they were looking for 2) the technical system interview, because the interviewer went super deep, pushing me on latency constraints, how I would design algorithms, and defining technical architectures that I wasn't familiar with.”
“The interview process consisted of several stages: an initial recruiter screening, an online assessment, technical/product interviews, and a final round of behavioral interviews. The recruiter screen focused on my background, product experience, and motivation for applying to Meta. This was followed by an online assessment that tested my product thinking, analytical skills, and ability to structure solutions clearly. In the technical interviews, I was evaluated on product sense, execution, and analytical thinking. I was asked to design product features, define success metrics, and walk through how I would investigate changes in key performance indicators. These interviews emphasized structured thinking, user-centric design, and data-driven decision-making. The final stage included behavioral interviews, where I discussed past experiences, leadership, conflict resolution, and how I align with Meta’s values. There was a strong focus on collaboration, impact, and ownership. Overall, the process was rigorous but well-structured. It largely matched my expectations in terms of the focus on product design, metrics, and behavioral fit. The emphasis on clarity of thought and structured problem-solving was particularly consistent with what I had anticipated. ”
“It was really interesting to me since Microsoft PM interviews are known to test heavily (sometimes only) on behavioural as opposed to PM frameworks. However, my experience was mostly PM frameworks with an AI twist on them, which tripped me up a little bit. ”
“The process was relatively straightforward. I don't think there were any questions there were misleading and everyone was nice and was professional.”
“The process was relatively straightforward. The hiring manager was very conversational and introduced himself. It felt like we were just having a chat. I was an internal hire so I might have had it easier than someone who would have interviewed from outside.”
“It was smooth and well-coordinated. Emphasis on your life story and how you got to where you are now, and why you are seeking out this role. Execution/product sense interview went well - it was specific to Shopify's business line, so I had to understand their user segments. ”
“The process was a part of campus recruiting. The interviewers created a comfortable environment and the rounds were conversational. 30-40% of the interview time was dedicated towards behavioural fit questions.”
“The process was pretty straightforward. Interviews were primarily focused on behavioural types of questions and my past work experience. I had a list of STAR stories prepared.”
Preview full access of other recent interview experiences
“The weirdest Anthropic round was the company values interview. It was almost like a therapy session, and honestly if you went to a therapist at some point, you will pass that round much more easily.”
“What was very unusual is they didn’t give me any tooling to draw the system design, so I just sketched it on a piece of paper and talked them through it, then we got into this oddly deep debate about whether hover-over history should count as a recommendation signal.”
